Characterization of focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier disruption effect on inflammation as a function of treatment parameters.
Authors: Angolano C, Hansen E, Ajjawi H, Nowlin P, Zhang Y, Thunemann N, Ferran C, Todd N
The technology of focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier (FUS-BBB opening) has now been used in over 20 Phase 1 clinical trials to validate the safety and feasibility of BBB opening for drug delivery in patients with brain tumors and neurodegenerative diseases. The primary treatment parameters, FUS intensity and microbubble dose, are chosen to balance sufficient BBB disruption to achieve drug delivery against potential acute vessel damage leading to microhemorrhage. However, other safety considerations due to second order effects caused by BBB disruption, such as inflammation and alteration of neurovascular function, are only beginning to be understood. This study builds on previous work that has investigated the inflammatory response following FUS-BBB opening. In this study, we characterize the effect of FUS intensity, microbubble dose and single vs multiple treatments on the extent of BBB disruption, observed level of microhemorrhage, and degree of inflammatory response at acute post-treatment time points in the wild-type mouse brain. Results show that upregulation of pro-inflammatory markers is primarily driven by microbubble dose, with peak effects seen at 24 hours post-treatment. We additionally saw significantly elevated levels of cytokine and chemokine markers in female vs male mice, despite no sex differences in level of BBB disruption or microglia activation. Multiple treatments did not result in increased levels of pro-inflammatory markers compared to single treatment baseline. However, we did see an interesting elevation of the anti-inflammatory molecule eNOS after multiple treatments, indicating active mechanisms were at work to restore homeostasis in the brain environment.
Introduction
Purpose
Drug delivery with BBB opening
Study Objective
To characterize how FUS intensity, microbubble dose, sex, and single versus multiple treatments affect BBB disruption, microhemorrhage, and the acute inflammatory response in the wild-type mouse brain.
Animal model / Human subject
CD-1 mice, 25-30 g
Disease model
Healthy
MRI or image guidance method
Stereotaxic
Targeted brain region(s)
Right striatum
Target coordinates
4.0 mm anterior, 2.5 mm lateral to interaural line
Cargo name and characteristics
Trypan blue
Route of administration
intravenous
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
Focused ultrasound BBB disruption induced a parameter-dependent inflammatory response, where microbubble dose drove pro-inflammatory markers and FUS intensity influenced microglial activation. Multiple FUS treatments did not cumulatively increase pro-inflammatory markers but elevated the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.
Duration of biological effect
Not reported
Safety-related matter
Increasing the microbubble dose drove a pronounced expression of pro-inflammatory markers, highlighting that acoustic parameters and microbubble doses must be optimized to minimize sterile inflammation.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Ultrasound instrument
In-house built FUS system
FUS Frequency
690 kHz
FUS Pressure
0.32 MPa; 0.36 MPa; 0.40 MPa
FUS Mode
pulsed
Pulse duration
10 ms
Duration of a single FUS session
2 min
Treatment frequency
Single and multiple sessions
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search