Focused Modulation of Brain Activity: A Narrative Review.
Authors: Zhantleuova A, Karimova A, Andreou AP, Kustubayeva AM, Giniatullin R, Davletov B
A wide range of strategies have been developed to modulate dysfunctional brain activities. This narrative review provides a comparative analysis of biophysical, genetic, and biological neuromodulation approaches with an emphasis on their known or unknown molecular targets and translational potential. The review incorporates data from both preclinical and clinical studies covering deep brain stimulation, transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation, focused ultrasound, chemogenetics, optogenetics, magnetogenetics, and toxin-based neuromodulation. Each method was assessed based on specificity, safety, reversibility, and mechanistic clarity. Biophysical methods are widely used in clinical practice but often rely on empirical outcomes due to undefined molecular targets. Genetic tools offer cell-type precision in experimental systems but face translational barriers related to delivery and safety. Biological agents, such as botulinum neurotoxins, provide long-lasting yet reversible inhibition via well-characterized molecular pathways. However, they require stereotaxic injections and remain invasive. To overcome individual limitations and improve targeting, delivery, and efficacy, there is a growing interest in the synthesis of multiple approaches. This review highlights a critical gap in the mechanistic understanding of commonly used methods. Addressing this gap by identifying molecular targets may help to improve therapeutic precision. This concise review could be valuable for researchers looking to enter the evolving field of the neuromodulation of brain function.
Introduction
Purpose
Other
Study Objective
To compare biophysical, genetic, and biological neuromodulation approaches with emphasis on their molecular targets, specificity, safety, reversibility, and translational potential.
Cargo name and characteristics
Botulinum neurotoxins — protein neurotoxins; Genetic cargos used in chemogenetics/optogenetics/magnetogenetics — transgenes encoding chemogenetic receptors, opsins or magnetogenetic proteins (protein-encoding constructs delivered via gene‑delivery methods/viral vectors); No specific AAV serotype, small molecule ligand, or nanoparticle explicitly named.
Route of administration
Stereotaxic (intracerebral/intracranial) injection
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
Various neuromodulation approaches can modulate dysfunctional brain activity: biophysical methods (DBS, transcranial electrical/magnetic stimulation) are clinically used but often mechanistically empirical, genetic tools (optogenetics, chemogenetics, magnetogenetics) offer cell-type precision but face delivery and safety barriers, and biological agents (botulinum neurotoxins) provide long-lasting, reversible inhibition via defined molecular pathways. The review did not test or report multiple focused ultrasound parameters or identify specific successful parameter sets.
Safety-related matter
The review states safety was assessed and highlights translational safety and delivery barriers for genetic tools and that biological agents (e.g., botulinum neurotoxins) require stereotaxic injections and remain invasive; no specific adverse effects are reported.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Focal Characteristics
Focal depth: None; Focal length: None; Aperture size: None
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search