Full-wave acoustic and thermal modeling of transcranial ultrasound propagation and investigation of skull-induced aberration correction techniques: a feasibility study.
Authors: Kyriakou A, Neufeld E, Werner B, Székely G, Kuster N
Transcranial focused ultrasound (tcFUS) is an attractive noninvasive modality for neurosurgical interventions. The presence of the skull, however, compromises the efficiency of tcFUS therapy, as its heterogeneous nature and acoustic characteristics induce significant distortion of the acoustic energy deposition, focal shifts, and thermal gain decrease. Phased-array transducers allow for partial compensation of skull-induced aberrations by application of precalculated phase and amplitude corrections. An integrated numerical framework allowing for 3D full-wave, nonlinear acoustic and thermal simulations has been developed and applied to tcFUS. Simulations were performed to investigate the impact of skull aberrations, the possibility of extending the treatment envelope, and adverse secondary effects. The simulated setup comprised an idealized model of the ExAblate Neuro and a detailed MR-based anatomical head model. Four different approaches were employed to calculate aberration corrections (analytical calculation of the aberration corrections disregarding tissue heterogeneities; a semi-analytical ray-tracing approach compensating for the presence of the skull; two simulation-based time-reversal approaches with and without pressure amplitude corrections which account for the entire anatomy). These impact of these approaches on the pressure and temperature distributions were evaluated for 22 brain-targets. While (semi-)analytical approaches failed to induced high pressure or ablative temperatures in any but the targets in the close vicinity of the geometric focus, simulation-based approaches indicate the possibility of considerably extending the treatment envelope (including targets below the transducer level and locations several centimeters off the geometric focus), generation of sharper foci, and increased targeting accuracy. While the prediction of achievable aberration correction appears to be unaffected by the detailed bone-structure, proper consideration of inhomogeneity is required to predict the pressure distribution for given steering parameters. Simulation-based approaches to calculate aberration corrections may aid in the extension of the tcFUS treatment envelope as well as predict and avoid secondary effects (standing waves, skull heating). Due to their superior performance, simulationbased techniques may prove invaluable in the amelioration of skull-induced aberration effects in tcFUS therapy. The next steps are to investigate shear-wave-induced effects in order to reliably exclude secondary hot-spots, and to develop comprehensive uncertainty assessment and validation procedures.
Introduction
Purpose
Other
Study Objective
Develop and apply an integrated 3D full-wave nonlinear acoustic and thermal simulation framework to evaluate skull-induced aberrations and compare phase/amplitude correction approaches for transcranial focused ultrasound.
Disease model
Healthy
MRI or image guidance method
MR-based anatomical head model (MRI guidance)
Targeted brain region(s)
corpus callosum
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
Simulation-based aberration correction methods (SPC, SPAC) outperforms analytical methods (DPC, RTPC), enabling sharper foci, higher targeting accuracy. Extended tcFUS treatment envelope to targets several cm from the geometric focus
Safety-related matter
Simulation indicated increased skull and scalp energy deposition with formation of thermal hotspots, particularly for corical or off focus targets when using simulation based aberration correction methods.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Ultrasound instrument
ExAblate Neuro (manufacturer: None; transducer aperture/diameter: None)
FUS Frequency
230 kHz
FUS Pressure
120.31 kPa
Duration of a single FUS session
20 s
Focal Characteristics
Focal depth: None; Focal length: None; Aperture size: 300 mm
Treatment frequency
Single
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search