Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound on Liposomes Containing Channel proteins.
Authors: Babakhanian M, Yang L, Nowroozi B, Saddik G, Boodaghians L, Blount P, Grundfest W
The ability to reversibly and non-invasively modulate region-specific brain activity in vivo suggests Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) as potential therapeutics for neurological dysfunctions such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease. While in vivo studies provide evidence of the bioeffects of LIFU on neuronal activity, they merely hint at potential mechanisms but do not fully explain how this technology achieves these effects. One potential hypothesis is that LIFU produces local membrane depolarization by mechanically perturbing the neuronal cell membrane, or activating channels or other proteins embedded in the membrane. Proteins that sense mechanical perturbations of the membrane, such as those gated by membrane tension, are prime candidates for activating in response to LIFU and thus leading to the neurological responses that have been measured. Here we use the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscL, which has been purified and reconstituted in liposomes, to determine how LIFU may affect the activation of this membrane-tension gated channel. Two bacterial voltage-gated channels, KvAP and NaK2K F92A channels were also studied. Surprisingly, the results suggest that ultrasound modulation and membrane perturbation does not induce channel gating, but rather induces pore formation at the membrane protein-lipid interface. However, in vesicles with high MscL mechanosensitive channel concentrations, apparent decreases in pore formation are observed, suggesting that this membrane-tension-sensitive protein may serve to increase the elasticity of the membrane, presumably because of expansion of the channel in the plane of the membrane independent of channel gating.
Introduction
Purpose
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation
Study Objective
To determine whether low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) directly gates the mechanosensitive channel MscL or instead induces membrane pore formation at protein–lipid interfaces using purified channels reconstituted in liposomes.
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
LIFU increased calcein efflux from channel-containing liposomes, consistent with pore formation at the protein lipid interface rather than channel gating
Safety-related matter
The authors state the LIFU parameters used are within FDA diagnostic imaging limits (I spta < 720 mW/cm2) and are considered safe/low-intensity; however, they note that LIFU can induce pore formation at protein–lipid interfaces and, according to models, could potentially cause damage to membrane proteins or cytoskeletal fibers. No in vivo adverse effects are reported in this in vitro liposome study.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Ultrasound instrument
Single element commercially available focused transducer (V301-SU, Olympus NDT, Waltham, MA)
FUS Frequency
0.5 MHz
FUS Intensity
0.394 W/cm2
FUS Pressure
0.14 Mpa
FUS Mode
pulsed
Duration of a single FUS session
10 min
Focal Characteristics
Focal depth: 29 mm, Focal length: 30 mm, Aperture size: 25.4 mm
Treatment frequency
Single
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search