A comparative study of experimental and simulated ultrasound beam propagation through cranial bones.
Authors: Krokhmal A, Simcock IC, Treeby BE, Martin E
<i>Objective.</i>Transcranial ultrasound is used in a variety of treatments, including neuromodulation, opening the blood-brain barrier, and high intensity focused ultrasound therapies. To ensure safety and efficacy of these treatments, numerical simulations of the ultrasound field within the brain are used for treatment planning and evaluation. This study investigates the accuracy of numerical modelling of the propagation of focused ultrasound through cranial bones.<i>Approach.</i>Holograms of acoustic fields after propagation through four human skull specimens were measured for frequencies ranging from 270 kHz to 1 MHz, using both quasi-continuous and pulsed modes. The open-source k-Wave toolbox was employed for simulations, using an equivalent-source hologram and a uniform bowl source with parameters that best matched the measured free-field pressure distribution.<i>Main results.</i>The average absolute error in k-Wave simulations with sound speed and density derived from CT scans compared to measurements was 15% for the spatial-peak acoustic pressure amplitude, 2.7 mm for the position of the focus, and 35% for the focal volume. Optimised uniform bowl sources achieved calculation accuracy comparable to that of the hologram sources.<i>Significance.</i>This method is demonstrated as a suitable tool for prediction of focal position, size and overall distribution of transcranial ultrasound fields. The accuracy of the shape and position of the focal region demonstrate the suitability of the sound speed and density mapping used here. However, large errors in pressure amplitude and transmission loss in some individual cases show that alternative methods for mapping individual skull attenuation are needed and the possibility of considerable errors in pressure amplitude should be taken into account when planning focused ultrasound studies or interventions in the human brain, and appropriate safety margins should be used.
Introduction
Purpose
Transcranial ultrasound stimulation
Study Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of k-Wave simulations of focused transcranial ultrasound propagation through ex vivo human skulls with CT-derived acoustic properties and to compare hologram-based versus uniform source models for subject-specific treatment planning.
Animal model / Human subject
Human (Homo sapiens), strain: N/A, age: not specified, sex: not specified
Disease model
healthy
MRI or image guidance method
CT-based guidance (sound speed and density mapping from CT scans used for simulation and targeting)
Targeted brain region(s)
Not Specified
Target coordinates
not reported
Cargo name and characteristics
Focused transcranial ultrasound — acoustic agent delivered at frequencies from 270 kHz to 1 MHz in quasi‑continuous and pulsed modes; characterized by spatial‑peak acoustic pressure amplitude, focal position and focal volume; delivered via focused transducers (modeled as equivalent‑source holograms or uniform bowl sources) and simulated with the k‑Wave toolbox for studies of neuromodulation, blood–brain barrier opening and focused ultrasound therapies.
Route of administration
Not applicable — no drug or cargo was delivered; the study investigated transcranial ultrasound field propagation through human skull specimens.
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
Simulations based on CT-derived sound speed and density accurately predicted focal position and shape of transcranial focused ultrasound (mean focal shift ~2.7 mm, focal volume error ~35%), but showed large and variable errors in pressure amplitude (mean ~15%, up to ~60%), indicating the need for individualized skull attenuation mapping and safety margins.
Duration of biological effect
48 hours
Safety-related matter
The paper warns that large errors (up to ~60%) in simulated spatial peak pressure and transmission loss could pose risks and recommends using appropriate safety margins when planning transcranial focused ultrasound studies or interventions.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Ultrasound instrument
Sonic Concepts, Bothell, WA, USA
FUS Frequency
270 kHz to 1 MHz
FUS Intensity
4 W
FUS Pressure
Not reported
FUS Mode
both (quasi-continuous and pulsed)
Pulse duration
Not reported
Duration of a single FUS session
Not stated in the provided text
Focal Characteristics
2.7 mm
Treatment frequency
not applicable
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search