Comparison of temperature processing methods for monitoring focused ultrasound ablation in the brain.
Authors: Rieke V, Instrella R, Rosenberg J, Grissom W, Werner B, Martin E, Pauly KB
To investigate the performance of different reconstruction methods for monitoring temperature changes during transcranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS). Four different temperature reconstruction methods were compared in volunteers (without heating) and patients undergoing transcranial MRgFUS: single baseline subtraction, multibaseline subtraction, hybrid single baseline/referenceless reconstruction, and hybrid multibaseline/referenceless reconstruction. Absolute temperature error and temporal temperature uncertainty of the different reconstruction methods were analyzed and compared. Absolute temperature errors and temporal temperature uncertainty were highest with single baseline subtraction and lowest with hybrid multibaseline/referenceless reconstruction in all areas of the brain. Pulsation of the brain and susceptibility changes from tongue motion or swallowing caused substantial temperature errors when single or multibaseline subtraction was used, which were much reduced when the referenceless component was added to the reconstruction. Hybrid multibaseline/referenceless thermometry accurately measures temperature changes in the brain with fewer artifacts and errors due to motion than pure baseline subtraction methods.
Introduction
Purpose
Thermal ablation
Study Objective
To investigate the performance of different temperature reconstruction methods for monitoring temperature changes during transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS).
Animal model / Human subject
Human (Homo sapiens), strain: N/A, age: not specified, sex: not specified
MRI or image guidance method
MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS)
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
Hybrid multibaseline/referenceless thermometry produced the most accurate and temporally stable brain temperature measurements with the fewest motion- and susceptibility-related artifacts (from brain pulsation, tongue motion, swallowing), while single baseline subtraction had the highest errors; no focused ultrasound parameter variations were tested.
Safety-related matter
No adverse effects or safety concerns were reported in the study; volunteers underwent imaging without heating and the paper does not mention any complications in patients undergoing transcranial MRgFUS.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Focal Characteristics
Focal depth: None; Focal length: None; Aperture size: None
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search