Pitt Shield

Microbubbles and blood-brain barrier opening: a numerical study on acoustic emissions and wall stress predictions.

Authors: Hosseinkhah N, Goertz DE, Hynynen K

Focused ultrasound with microbubbles is an emerging technique for blood-brain barrier opening. Here, a comprehensive theoretical model of a bubble-fluid-vessel system has been developed which accounts for the bubble's nonspherical oscillations inside a microvessel, and its resulting acoustic emissions. Numerical simulations of unbound and confined encapsulated bubbles were performed to evaluate the effect of the vessel wall on acoustic emissions and vessel wall stresses. Using a Marmottant shell model, the normalized second harmonic to fundamental emissions first decreased as a function of pressure (>50 kPa) until reaching a minima ("transition point") at which point they increased. The transition point of unbound compared to confined bubble populations occurred at different pressures and was associated with an accompanying increase in shear and circumferential wall stresses. As the wall stresses depend on the bubble to vessel wall distance, the stresses were evaluated for bubbles with their wall at a constant distance to a flat wall. As a result, the wall stresses were bubble size and frequency dependent and the peak stress values induced by bubbles larger than resonance remained constant versus frequency at a constant mechanical index.

Introduction

Purpose Drug delivery with BBB opening
Study Objective To develop a comprehensive theoretical model of bubble–fluid–vessel interactions to evaluate how vessel confinement affects bubble acoustic emissions and induced vessel wall stresses during focused ultrasound blood–brain barrier opening.

Outcomes and Safety

Summary of Outcomes Focused ultrasound–driven bubble oscillations produced pressure-dependent changes in acoustic emissions (normalized second harmonic/fundamental decreased above ~50 kPa to a ‘transition point’ then increased) and generated shear and circumferential vessel-wall stresses that depended on bubble confinement, size, distance to the wall and frequency. Parameters found to strongly affect outcomes were ultrasound pressure (notably >50 kPa and a confinement-shifted transition point), bubble confinement (unbound vs confined), bubble size relative to resonance, driving frequency, and mechanical index (peak stresses for bubbles larger than resonance were constant versus frequency at a constant MI).
Safety-related matter The paper reports increases in shear and circumferential vessel wall stresses associated with bubble transition points and that peak stresses depend on bubble size and frequency; it does not report any explicit clinical adverse effects or other safety outcomes.

Brain Region

Visualization unavailable

Ultrasound Parameters

FUS Pressure >0.05 MPa
Focal Characteristics Focal depth: None, Focal length: None, Aperture size: None

We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.

← Back to Search