Improving Transcranial Acoustic Targeting: The Limits of CT-Based Velocity Estimates and the Role of MR.
Authors: Webb TD, Fu F, Leung SA, Ghanouni P, Dahl JJ, Does MD, Pauly KB
Transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) enables the noninvasive treatment of the deep brain. This capacity relies on the ability to focus acoustic energy through the in-tact skull, a feat that requires accurate estimates of the acoustic velocity in individual patient skulls. In current practice, these estimates are generated using a pretreatment computed tomography (CT) scan and then registered to a magnetic resonance (MR) dataset on the day of the treatment. Treatment safety and efficacy can be improved by eliminating the need to register the CT data to the MR images and by improving the accuracy of acoustic velocity measurements. In this study, we examine the capacity of MR to supplement or replace CT as a means of estimating velocity in the skull. We find that MR can predict velocity with less but comparable accuracy to CT. We then use micro-CT imaging to better understand the limitations of Hounsfield unit (HU)-based estimates of velocity, demonstrating that the macrostructure of pores in the skull contributes to the acoustic velocity of the bone. We find evidence that detailed T2 measurements provide information about pore macrostructure similar to the information obtained with micro-CT, offering a potential clinical mechanism for improving patient-specific estimates of acoustic velocity in the human skull.
Introduction
Purpose
Thermal ablation
Study Objective
To determine whether MR imaging can supplement or replace CT for estimating skull acoustic velocity to improve transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound treatment planning.
Animal model / Human subject
Homo sapiens (human); strain: N/A; age: not specified; sex: not specified
Disease model
Healthy
MRI or image guidance method
Transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound (tcMRgFUS); pre-treatment CT scans registered to MR for skull acoustic velocity estimation
Outcomes and Safety
Summary of Outcomes
MR-based estimates predict skull acoustic velocity with slightly lower but comparable accuracy to CT; micro-CT shows skull pore macrostructure contributes to acoustic velocity, and detailed T2 MRI provides similar pore-structure information to micro-CT, suggesting T2 MRI could improve patient-specific velocity estimates and reduce reliance on CT.
Safety-related matter
The paper states that treatment safety and efficacy can be improved by eliminating the need to register CT to MR and by improving acoustic velocity estimates; no adverse effects or safety events are reported.
Brain Region
Ultrasound Parameters
Focal Characteristics
Focal depth: None; Focal length: None; Aperture size: None
We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.
← Back to Search