Pitt Shield

Sonobiopsy for minimally invasive, spatiotemporally-controlled, and sensitive detection of glioblastoma-derived circulating tumor DNA.

Authors: Pacia CP, Yuan J, Yue Y, Xu L, Nazeri A, Desai R, Gach HM, Wang X, Talcott MR, Chaudhuri AA, Dunn GP, Leuthardt EC, Chen H

Though surgical biopsies provide direct access to tissue for genomic characterization of brain cancer, they are invasive and pose significant clinical risks. Brain cancer management via blood-based liquid biopsies is a minimally invasive alternative; however, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts the release of brain tumor-derived molecular biomarkers necessary for sensitive diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> A mouse glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) model was used to demonstrate the capability of focused ultrasound (FUS)-enabled liquid biopsy (sonobiopsy) to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of brain tumor-specific genetic mutations compared with conventional blood-based liquid biopsy. Furthermore, a pig GBM model was developed to characterize the translational implications of sonobiopsy in humans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided FUS sonication was performed in mice and pigs to locally enhance the BBB permeability of the GBM tumor. Contrast-enhanced T<sub>1</sub>-weighted MR images were acquired to evaluate the BBB permeability change. Blood was collected immediately after FUS sonication. Droplet digital PCR was used to quantify the levels of brain tumor-specific genetic mutations in the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Histological staining was performed to evaluate the potential for off-target tissue damage by sonobiopsy. <b>Results:</b> Sonobiopsy improved the detection sensitivity of EGFRvIII from 7.14% to 64.71% and TERT C228T from 14.29% to 45.83% in the mouse GBM model. It also improved the diagnostic sensitivity of EGFRvIII from 28.57% to 100% and TERT C228T from 42.86% to 71.43% in the porcine GBM model. <b>Conclusion:</b> Sonobiopsy disrupts the BBB at the spatially-targeted brain location, releases tumor-derived DNA into the blood circulation, and enables timely collection of ctDNA. Converging evidence from both mouse and pig GBM models strongly supports the clinical translation of sonobiopsy for the minimally invasive, spatiotemporally-controlled, and sensitive molecular characterization of brain cancer.

Introduction

Purpose Sonobiopsy
Study Objective To evaluate whether MRI-guided focused ultrasound (sonobiopsy) can transiently disrupt the blood-brain barrier to increase the sensitivity of blood-based detection of GBM-specific mutations (EGFRvIII and TERT C228T) in mouse and porcine models.
Animal model / Human subject Mus musculus, not specified, not specified, not specified; Sus scrofa, not specified, not specified, not specified
Disease model Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
MRI or image guidance method Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) sonication; contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images were acquired to evaluate BBB permeability change.
Targeted brain region(s) Glioblastoma Multiforme (Gbm) Tumor Site
Target coordinates Not provided

Outcomes and Safety

Summary of Outcomes MRI-guided focused ultrasound (sonobiopsy) transiently disrupts the blood–brain barrier to release tumor-derived DNA into the blood, markedly increasing detection sensitivity of EGFRvIII and TERT C228T ctDNA in mouse and pig GBM models with minimal off-target tissue damage.
Duration of biological effect not reported
Safety-related matter Sonobiopsy did not pose significant safety risks—no significant off-target parenchymal damage or increase in apoptosis was observed in mice or pigs, although some focal microhemorrhages and transient T2*-MRI abnormalities were noted in FUS-targeted tumor regions consistent with reversible, localized damage.

Brain Region

Ultrasound Parameters

Ultrasound instrument single-element focused ultrasound transducer
FUS Pressure Not reported in the provided text
FUS Mode pulsed
Pulse duration Not reported in the provided text
Duration of a single FUS session Not reported
Treatment frequency single session

We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.

← Back to Search