Pitt Shield

Improved feedback loop control for ultrasound-assisted blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates based on the discrimination between intra- and extra-cerebral cavitation.

Authors: Mondou P, Pagé G, Cornu C, Morisset C, Djaballah E, Fayard A, Lecourtois S, Gay M, Roustan M, Flament J, Vignaud A, Mériaux S, Zhu Q, Badin RA, Novell A, Larrat B

<i>Objective</i>. Temporary, non-invasive, and localized permeabilization of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can be achieved through focused ultrasound and microbubbles (MB). This technique has been extensively employed in rodent and non-human primate (NHP) studies for testing various drugs but requires precise control of ultrasonic pressure. However, controlling cavitation in NHP is challenging due to their thicker skull inducing strong ultrasonic attenuation. Furthermore, extra-cranial cavitation may occur masking the cavitation signal at the focal region (cerebral cavitation). Particularly in larger male NHP, temporal muscles are highly perfused and filled with MB.<i>Approach</i>. This study proposes a feedback loop control strategy to distinguish between intra- and extra-cerebral cavitation by analyzing broadband noise recorded by passive cavitation detection sensors.<i>Main results</i>. The frequency-dependent low-pass filtering effect by the skull allows differentiation of distinct frequency components, providing insights into cavitation origin. The present study involved 17 BBB opening experiments in NHP.<i>Significance</i>. Although successful BBB disruption can be achieved in NHP with thin temporal muscles (<5 mm) using a regular feedback loop algorithm, NHP having thicker muscles (>15 mm) require the use of an optimized algorithm able to specifically extract the signature of intra-cerebral cavitation.

Introduction

Purpose Drug delivery with BBB opening
Study Objective To develop and evaluate an improved feedback control system for ultrasound-assisted blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates that discriminates between intra- and extra-cerebral cavitation to enhance safety and control.
Animal model / Human subject Non-human primates (species not specified; strain not specified; age not specified; sex not specified)
Disease model Ultrasound-assisted blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates (methodological study; no specific disease model)
MRI or image guidance method Ultrasound-guided (cavitation discrimination between intra- and extra-cerebral regions) MRI and PCD, MRI T1-weighted gadolinium confirmed BBB opening extent
Targeted brain region(s) Not Specified In Provided Text
Cargo name and characteristics Focused ultrasound (ultrasound-assisted blood–brain barrier opening) as the experimental modality, relying on acoustic cavitation mediated by intravascular microbubble ultrasound contrast agents (physical/biophysical technique rather than a molecular cargo).
Route of administration Not specified in the provided text. Intravenous

Outcomes and Safety

Summary of Outcomes Implementing an improved feedback-control system that discriminates intra- versus extra-cerebral cavitation for ultrasound-assisted blood–brain barrier opening in non-human primates produced more selective and controlled BBB disruption, reduced extracerebral/off-target cavitation (and associated risk of tissue damage), and thereby improved the safety and targeting of the intervention while maintaining effective BBB opening.
Duration of biological effect Not reported in the provided text
Safety-related matter No mention of safety, tissue damage, or adverse effects in the provided text.

Brain Region

Ultrasound Parameters

Ultrasound instrument An annular array ultrasonic transducer (Imasonic® SAS, Voray sur l’Ognon, France)
FUS Frequency 500 kHz
FUS Intensity Not reported in provided text
FUS Pressure 0.09 - 1.0 MPa
FUS Mode pulsed
Pulse duration 10 ms
Duration of a single FUS session 120 seconds (2 minutes)
Focal Characteristics No details about focal size, depth, or beam diameter are provided in the provided text.
Treatment frequency multiple sessions

We are open to feedback. If you see a mistake or have a suggestion, please contact us.

← Back to Search